"Coming Out" in America Must be made easier. Huh?

So I was reading Todd Hill's blog over on Burnt Orange Report. He writes about how Joel Burns, a city councilman in Forth Worth, openly came out about his homosexuality, while in session. I ask, why? Why does anyone even need to know?  I suppose the other councilmen and women should work up the courage to come out about their heterosexuality, just so we can be sure. Todd Hill solidly approves, stating that Burn's exhibited "courage", rarely seen in politics, in his opinion.  

I really feel that the whole LGBTG, wait, did I get all the groups, I think so. Anyway, the Gay lobby is just another  "and then?" type of group. Example:

Gay Lobby: You must stop slandering homosexuality as a mental illness! (1970s)

America: Ok, fine, we will strike down biology and western tradition.

Gay Lobby: And then?

Fast forward a few years....

Gay Lobby: We want to be in the military! Regardless of how the troops feel about it. (1990s)

America: Fine you can serve, but you can't be open about it.

Gay Lobby: And then?

....

Gay Lobby: You MUST allow us to marry, our relationships are the equal of yours.

America: No.

Gay Lobby: ...rubbing greedy hands... we shall use the media and our liberal contacts to thwart the people through their own justice system.

America: Fine, we'll roll over and quit.

Gay Lobby: And then? And then? And then?

Okay, maybe I went a little overboard. But it's always going to be a case of "and then" with the gay lobby. Even after gay marriage is legal in all 50 states, there will always be something for them to complain about, some dark corner where inequality still exists. The media, in its quest to abolish any remnant of Christian and European heritage, is always in support of the gay lobby.

Remember  District Judge Vaughn Walker? The one who overturned the California gay marriage ban. Did you know he himself is an open homosexual?  I find it odd how he could even preside over such a ruling, I suppose he is above having a conflict of interests. Here is an AP article from August, there is no mention of him being gay, that was carefully omitted by most of the media.

The unfortunate fact is that our nations Constitution is far too vague. We needed an explicit and direct document to govern this nation as the founding fathers desired. Once they all died off,  criminals slowly took their place, on both sides of the isle. I believe that when you must rule on homosexuality, if it should be legal under the "pursuit of happiness", you must look at the founding fathers themselves. How did they feel about homosexuality?

Thomas Jefferson drafted a bill for Virginia that set the penalty for sodomy as castration.

George Washington commented on the the courts martial of a Lt Malcom Enslin, accused of sodomy. He professed his "abhorrence and detestation of such infamous crimes".

Those two alone had such "hateful" and "bigoted" views, would they have felt differently when drafting the Constitution?

No one should stop gays from being gay. And no one should have to have the gay agenda rammed down their throat every time they turn on the television. Let's make it a non-issue.